GBS organizations are still relevant in today’s environment, but their role has grown increasingly sophisticated as managers of diverse service delivery models, including centralized captive services, outsourced delivery, and function-focused activities. The benefits of GBS organizations have concomitantly expanded from those associated with narrow transaction processing cost-cutting to those linked to business outcomes and value-added results. GBS organizations will increasingly scale elastically, depending on service delivery focus and value generation.
Before the pandemic blew the world of operations apart, global business services (GBS) had emerged as the most popular internal management structure for managing an enterprise’s middle-to-back-office processes, usually coupled with managing service provider relationships, where some types of work were outsourced where it made sense. However, new data from the HFS OneOffice™ Pulse Study, H1 of 800 Global 2000 enterprises in Exhibit 1 reveals that the relevance of old-school GBS has changed, and newer models are making their way to occupy share. GBS is not going away anytime soon, but we’re refreshing how we look at it.
Sample: 800 respondents from Global 2000 enterprises
Source: HFS Research Pulse Study, H1 2021
There is a notable uptick in focus on outsourcing as we venture into this new virtual economy. In fact, we haven’t seen a boom like this in demand for tech and business process services since the dot-com days. What’s more, we believe the services market for the virtual economy is only just ramping up; we only have to examine the growth of the leading service providers in Exhibit 2 to see this shift.
*Each year based on Q2-Q2 earnings
Source: HFS Research Pulse, 2021, Public Sources
In July 2021, HFS conducted a digital roundtable with Capgemini to explore the future of GBS and the role of outsourcing. More than 30 industry leaders from major enterprises and law and consulting firms participated. The session title was GBS vs. Outsourcing—It Ain’t that Simple, and yes, the discussion and takeaways confirmed that there are few clear-cut trade-offs in choosing a delivery or operating model. The pandemic was partially responsible for this management sea change; equally central was the steady drive to automate processes, implement artificial intelligence (AI), wage a talent acquisition war, and, most importantly, frame results to create expansive business outcomes.
Many participating organizations have between one and two thousand staff members in their GBS organizations and manage multiple outsourcer relationships. Indeed, one of the companies had 60 third-party service providers and outsourcing partners.
Most companies are on a journey similar to that of a giant pharmaceutical company. First, they cut costs, and then, they focus on enhancing customer experience. Finally, they work on digital enablement and service delivery, including building a digital marketing organization within GBS.
We asked our roundtable about the evolution of the GBS operating model, and the focus fell on building ecosystems. The migration to developing digital services and enabling the overall digitization of the organization hinges on successfully deploying this ecosystem mindset, and exhibit 3 shows the same.
Sample: Survey of 30 GBS leaders, July 2021
Source: HFS Research, 2021
GBS as the catalyst to drive lower-cost transaction processing is becoming less critical as automation invades most business operations. The notion of GBS being a capability delivery center, though ill-defined at the moment within most organizations, is the next service delivery underpinning. A capability-based GBS organization can deliver services around data analysis, digital transformation, etc. Most companies at our roundtable provide some of these activities, but GBS organizations have not in general formalized a new branding message and charter to convey this shift in emphasis.
The evolving role of ecosystem orchestration
Indeed, when we asked the roundtable to identify the most dominant characteristic of GBS organizations for the next five years, they agreed that its most critical role is as an orchestrator with several specific responsibilities:
The service orchestration layer is critical. You can honestly have 60 vendors, 600, or 6. But until you have that solid service orchestration layer that ensures the vendors operate like an orchestra instead of prima donnas, you will fail—I think service orchestration is the secret sauce right there.
– Vice President & Head of Global Business Services, JTI
‘Orchestration’ is the magic word here—with the end-to-end approach towards GBS service delivery plans being fully aligned to company strategic objectives. No doubt, having BPO as a partner with its know-how is a great benefit to GBS organizations in ‘orchestrating’ our delivery ecosystem today and, even more importantly, tomorrow.
– Maciej Piwowarczyk, VP & Head of Global Business Services, Discovery
Roundtable participants also identified a few significant challenges revolving around management and culture vs. service delivery, specifically.
The impact on outsourcers will be dramatic in this new environment, requiring more service delivery flexibility, the ability to work with multiple stakeholder groups, and the capability to substitute services at a moment’s notice depending on specific business conditions. The opportunities are also substantial as GBS organizations take on new responsibilities to deliver increasingly sophisticated services, leveraging partner ecosystems to be successful.
Register now for immediate access of HFS' research, data and forward looking trends.
Get StartedIf you don't have an account, Register here |
Register now for immediate access of HFS' research, data and forward looking trends.
Get Started