India’s healthcare system has long tried to emulate US models, with value-based care (VBC) being the latest trend. The idea behind VBC—linking payments to health outcomes—is noble in theory but has largely failed in the US. Even after decades of experimentation, the US healthcare model struggles to lower costs or significantly improve care quality.
Healthcare is fundamentally local, shaped by each country’s unique demographics, infrastructure, and resources. India’s healthcare challenges—from rural access and affordability to a high burden of infectious and chronic diseases—require solutions that fit its distinct context. Adopting a US-style VBC model would likely exacerbate existing issues rather than solve them.
Instead, India has a unique opportunity to learn from the failures of the US model and design a healthcare framework that aligns with its specific needs. By leveraging its strengths, such as digital expertise, cost-effective solutions, and a focus on primary care, India can build a system that addresses its healthcare challenges and sets a new standard globally. The goal should be to craft a model that is simpler, more affordable, and better suited to delivering equitable care to India’s diverse population.
The US experience with VBC reveals a fundamental issue: measuring ‘value’ in healthcare is more complex than anticipated. Connecting payments to outcomes requires extensive data and standardized metrics—challenges even advanced healthcare systems in the UK and Germany have struggled to overcome.
The US model creates financial risks and administrative burdens for healthcare providers, with compliance costs consuming up to 20% of revenues. India’s healthcare system, which is known for its low-cost, high-impact solutions, would be overwhelmed by this level of complexity. Instead, India should focus on straightforward, practical measures that align incentives and minimize compliance burdens (see Exhibit 1).
Source: HFS Research, 2025
Focusing solely on the US model would limit India’s potential to innovate and develop a more effective healthcare system. While it is true that the US has made significant advancements in medical technology, specialized care, and research, its healthcare system is the most expensive (more than $15,000 per capita), with outcomes (life expectancy, prevalence of chronic conditions) that are amongst the worst for Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries.
Countries such as the UK, Canada, Germany, Sri Lanka, and Japan offer valuable lessons to India’s healthcare system. However, while these nations present strong models, they face significant challenges, such as extended waiting times, escalating costs, and administrative complexities that India must proactively avoid. The UK’s National Health Service (NHS) demonstrates the benefits of robust public funding but struggles with significant waiting times and workforce shortages due to constrained resources. Canada’s publicly funded healthcare system ensures equitable access but grapples with long wait times for elective care and lacks universal coverage for pharmaceuticals and dental services. Germany’s dual public-private insurance model achieves comprehensive coverage but faces rising costs driven by an aging population and complexities that risk creating inequities. Similarly, Japan’s universal insurance system offers affordable healthcare but suffers from financial strain, overutilization of hospital care, and insufficient focus on managing chronic diseases. Exhibit 2 demonstrates the pros and cons of several global healthcare models.
Source: HFS Research, 2025
Disclaimer: The data in this table is based on publicly available sources. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, healthcare statistics may vary due to different secondary sources.
The key for India is to learn from what other countries do well and to avoid their mistakes. Crafting a healthcare model that combines the best global practices while addressing local needs and constraints is essential to success. This requires carefully adapting best practices to India’s unique demographic, economic, and healthcare landscape. Exhibit 3 shows a few examples of how India can consider tweaking the industry’s best practices to its advantage.
Source: HFS Research, 2025
India’s healthcare ecosystem has several distinct advantages, different from those of its global peers, which have positively shaped its trajectory:
Pharmacy of the world
Community health networks and hybrid care models
Digital healthcare innovations
State-level initiatives for affordable care
By leveraging these strengths, India can build a healthcare system that meets local needs and sets a new global standard for affordable and equitable care.
India has the opportunity to design an effective care model. By doing so, it can catch up with global health systems, leap ahead, and provide genuinely value-driven healthcare to all its citizens.
Indian policymakers must forge a distinctively Indian path that includes:
Register now for immediate access of HFS' research, data and forward looking trends.
Get StartedIf you don't have an account, Register here |
Register now for immediate access of HFS' research, data and forward looking trends.
Get Started